RPFit   RPFit

RPFitness News

April 23, 2009
For the last 30 years experts have been convincing men that dist

March 22, 2009
Visit Merriman Valley's Health & Wellness Fair

September 1, 2008
Personalized Wellness Center aquires RPFitness creating Akron's

August 11, 2008
All U.S. adults could be overweight in 40 years

July 26, 2008
The Importance of Exercise

Fitness / Medical News

Epitwin: Largest Ever Epigenetics Project Launched
Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:00:00 PDT
One of the most ambitious large-scale projects in Human...

News From The Annals Of Internal Medicine: September 7, 2010
Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:00:00 PDT
1. A Low-carb Diet Based on Animal Protein May Increase...

Consumers Misled By Low-Carbohydrate Claims
Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:00:00 PDT
Food manufacturers advertise a variety of foods on...

 

Short-term, high-intensity training produces similar adaptations to traditional
Short-term, high-intensity training produces similar adaptations to traditional endurance training

by Dr. Paul Cribb Ph.D. CSCS.
AST Director of Research

New study shows that high-intensity interval training is an effective training tool that enhances endurance performance.

Researchers at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada recently compared the physiological and performance effects of both interval and traditional endurance based training by using sixteen men placed into one of two cycling groups. The sprint training group performed four to six all out maximal 30 second sprints separated by four minutes of recovery. The traditional endurance training group performed continuous exercise for 90 - 120 minutes at an intensity of 65% of maximal aerobic capacity.

The duration of training was only two weeks and performance was assessed by pre and post training time trials that were designed to measure the time to complete a designated amount of work. Muscle samples were also taken prior to and after the two weeks of training.

Results showed no differences in performance (the time to complete the trials). Whereas the sprint training group showed an improvement of 10.1%, the traditional endurance training group only improved by 7.5%. Additionally, both groups exhibited the same adaptations in muscle oxidative capacity, buffering capacity, and glycogen utilization.

The key aspect of this research was the difference in the time commitment to the two training protocols. The sprint training required only 2.5 hours a week while the traditional endurance training program required 10.5 hours a week. However, the sprint training program yielded results that were equal to or better than the endurance program.

Based upon these findings, the authors concluded that high-intensity training may be a very time efficient way to induce physiological adaptations similar to those seen with traditional long term endurance training.

Source: Journal of Applied Physiology, 575:901-911, 2006.
 

RPFit   RPFit